E2 Visa Refusal – Investment Not Substantial or Marginal Enterprise

by

If your E-2 visa was denied because the investment wasn’t considered “substantial” or the business was labeled a “marginal enterprise,” you’re not alone and we’ve successfully helped many clients in this exact situation obtain approvals. These are among the most common reasons for E-2 visa refusals, often stemming from concerns about the scale or economic impact of the business. However, many of these denials can be reversed by presenting a stronger legal strategy, detailed financial documentation, and a clear plan that demonstrates the business’s ability to support more than just the investor. We’ve guided numerous applicants in rebuilding and resubmitting their cases with successful outcomes.

How much money is needed for an E-2 visa? There’s no official minimum, but your investment must be enough to make the business operational and demonstrate commitment. Many successful E-2 visas are based on investments between $100,000 to $200,000, but it depends on the nature of the business. Is $50,000 enough? Sometimes, but only for very small, low overhead businesses like solo consultants or online ventures with clear proof of business viability. You must also show the investment is at risk and committed.

What counts as a substantial investment? The investment must be proportional to the cost of starting or buying the business. So if you’re starting a consulting firm for $60,000, investing $50,000 might be sufficient. But for a business that requires $250,000 to start, a $50,000 investment likely won’t be enough.

Can I use a loan or gift? Yes but it depends. Can a service-based business qualify? Absolutely. Many successful E-2 cases are built on service based businesses like marketing firms, tech consulting, legal translation, education services, and more. The key is showing a real, active business with future potential for job creation and not just a solo operation with no growth plan.

Does equipment and rent count toward investment? Yes, reasonable startup expenses like office rent, equipment, software, and marketing costs can all be included provided they’re already spent or contractually committed at the time of application.

If you’ve been denied or are unsure if your investment qualifies, don’t guess. These cases are highly fact specific, and a strong legal presentation can make the difference between approval and rejection. Contact our office at 305-515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com to schedule a consultation. We’ve helped entrepreneurs around the world turn initial refusals into successful E-2 visas and we can help you do the same.

E2 Visa Refusal – Funds Not Irrevocably Committed

by

One of the most common reasons for E-2 visa denial is a finding that the investment funds are not irrevocably committed but we’ve successfully helped many clients in this exact situation secure approvals. This issue arises when consular officers determine that the funds are still sitting in a personal bank account or haven’t yet been fully spent or contractually obligated for business use. If your E-2 visa was denied because the funds were not considered “at risk,” it likely means the officer didn’t see sufficient proof that you had taken concrete steps to actually build or activate the business. We’ve guided numerous applicants through this by helping them demonstrate that their investment is fully committed and meets the strict E-2 visa requirements.

Applicants often ask, “What does irrevocably committed mean for the E2 visa?” It means that you must show the money is already committed to the success of the enterprise. The funds cannot simply be promised or held in escrow pending visa approval. Bank statements alone are not enough. You must show a detailed breakdown of where the money went and how it supports the business launch.

We also hear this concern: “Can I apply for an E2 visa before spending the money?” Technically, yes but only if you can prove the funds are contractually bound to be spent and are at risk of loss. A simple wire transfer to a business account without proof of disbursement is unlikely to be sufficient. If your E2 visa was denied because the money was still in your account, it’s likely because the officer didn’t see enough evidence of action and business readiness.

To strengthen a future application, it’s important to understand how to show E2 funds are committed. You’ll need to submit proof of investment. If your E2 visa was refused due to lack of proof of committed funds, we can work with you to correct these issues and prepare a new, stronger filing.

If you’re confused about the difference between source of funds vs committed funds for the E2 visa, here’s the key: the source of funds explains where your money came from and proves it was earned legally. The committed funds requirement shows how you’ve already used those funds to launch the business. Both are essential, but meeting one without the other will not get your visa approved.

If your E2 visa was denied because your investment wasn’t fully committed, you’re not alone and we can help. We’ve guided clients through restructured investments, documented proper fund usage, and won approvals after initial denials. Call our office at 305-515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com to schedule a consultation. Let’s get your E2 case back on track.

E2 Visa Refusal – Source of Funds Not Clearly Lawful

by

If your E-2 visa was denied due to source of funds issues, you’re not alone and we’ve successfully helped many applicants turn that denial into an approval. This is one of the most frequent reasons E-2 visas are refused, usually because the consular officer determined that the investment funds were not clearly documented or lawfully obtained. Even when your capital comes from legitimate sources such as business income, family savings, or an inheritance, your application can still be denied if the documentation doesn’t clearly prove the lawful origin. We’ve guided numerous clients through this challenge by organizing detailed, credible evidence that satisfies consular scrutiny and results in E-2 visa approval.

Many clients ask, “How do I prove the source of funds for an E2 visa?” To meet the E2 visa source of funds requirements, you must provide a detailed paper trail showing where every dollar came from. If you received money as a gift or loan for E2 visa investment, you must also show where the giver or lender got the funds. Vague declarations or unexplained large cash deposits often lead to denials for having an unlawful source of funds or funds not clearly documented.

We’ve seen a rise in E2 visa denials because of cash deposits, especially when funds were stored informally or in personal safes before deposit. Cryptocurrency can also trigger red flags. If you plan to use crypto assets as your E2 visa source of funds, be prepared to show clear blockchain transaction history. The government wants to see that your funds are both legal and traceable.

If your funds came from inheritance, you’ll need to provide legal proof.. A letter from a family member is not enough.

Don’t let a paperwork mistake or missing documentation cost you your visa. If your E2 visa was denied due to source of funds, contact us today at 305-515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com. We’ve helped clients around the world overcome these issues with proper legal strategy, clear documentation, and strong advocacy. Let us help you move your investment forward.

E2 Visa Refusal – Applicant Lacks Intent to Depart US Upon Expiration

by

Being denied an E-2 visa under INA §214(b) can be incredibly frustrating, especially when the refusal is based on a perceived lack of intent to depart the US after your visa expires. We’ve successfully helped many clients overcome this exact issue, even after they were initially denied despite having a legitimate business and a qualifying investment. In many cases, consular officers interpret factors like personal ties, prior visa history, or even how you answer certain questions during the interview as indicators of immigrant intent. While the E-2 is a nonimmigrant visa, any suspicion that you intend to remain in the US permanently can result in a denial. Through careful preparation and strategic documentation, we’ve helped applicants address these concerns and secure E-2 approvals.

We’ve helped numerous clients overcome 214(b) refusals and secure E-2 visa approvals. If your visa was denied on this basis, this blog will walk you through why it happened and, more importantly, what steps you can take to strengthen your case for reapplication.

E2 visa holders must show that they intend to leave the US when their status ends. This doesn’t mean you can’t eventually apply for a green card but you must demonstrate clear nonimmigrant intent at the time of the visa interview. Officers often look for evidence of strong ties to your home country. If you’ve sold everything in your country or moved your entire life to the US, the consulate may conclude that you don’t plan to return. That’s when we see E2 visa refusals based on intent to depart.

Every case is different, and the strategy should match your personal and professional circumstances. We are often asked, “Can I reapply after an E2 visa denial under 214(b)?” The answer is yes but it’s essential to address the reasons for refusal directly and with better documentation. A well prepared new application with stronger proof of ties can often succeed where the first attempt failed.

If your E2 visa was denied due to concerns about your intent to depart the US. don’t give up. Our office has helped many investors overcome this problem with tailored legal strategies and compelling evidence. Call us at 305-515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com to schedule a consultation. We can help you reapply with confidence and get your business plans back on track.

Expedited Removal INA 235(b)(1)

by

Expedited Removal under INA § 235(b)(1) is a fast-track removal process used by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) for certain foreign nationals found inadmissible at the border.

What is Expedited Removal?

Expedited removal is a legal procedure authorized under Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 235(b)(1) that allows CBP officers to remove foreign nationals without a hearing before an immigration judge. It was created to quickly deport individuals who are clearly inadmissible under specific provisions of the law.

Who Can Be Subject to Expedited Removal?

You can be placed in expedited removal if:

  1. You are arriving at a US port of entry (like an airport, land border, or seaport), and
  2. You are found inadmissible for one or more of the following:
    • Lacking valid entry documents (INA § 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I))
    • Using fraud or misrepresentation to gain entry (INA § 212(a)(6)(C)(i))

Expedited removal also applies within the US interior (usually within 100 miles of a border and within 14 days of unlawful entry) but is mostly used at airports and land crossings.

Legal Procedure and No Right to Judge

Key aspects of expedited removal:

  • No right to see an immigration judge
  • No formal hearing or chance to present a defense
  • Decision made solely by a CBP officer
  • Removal is immediate or within hours/days
  • Bar to re-entry for 5 years (INA § 212(a)(9)(A)(i))

What Happens After Expedited Removal?

You are usually:

  • Returned to your home country (same day or after a short detention)
  • Banned from reentering the US for 5 years
  • If fraud or misrepresentation was involved, subject to a permanent bar unless waived

You will receive a Form I-860 (Notice and Order of Expedited Removal), and CBP may cancel your existing visa (if any) under 22 C.F.R. § 41.122(h)(3).

Can You Challenge Expedited Removal?

If you believe that the expedited removal order was issued in error or resulted from a misunderstanding, it is possible to challenge the decision and request that the order be rescinded. Our team has successfully represented numerous individuals in similar situations, helping them reverse removal orders and restore their ability to lawfully enter the United States.

If you were expedited removed, the consequences are serious but not permanent. With prompt and strategic legal support, many people are able to restore their visa eligibility and return to the U.S.

Call us today at (305) 515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com to schedule a consultation. We’ve helped clients overcome expedited removal orders and CBP revocations and we’re ready to help you do the same.

Winning a Green Card Without a Sponsor: How We Help Non-Traditional Professionals Qualify for a National Interest Waiver (NIW)

by

Are you a skilled professional without publications, a PhD, or a US employer willing to sponsor you for a green card? You may still qualify for permanent residence in the US through a National Interest Waiver (NIW) even if you’re in a field that isn’t traditionally associated with scientific research or academia.

Many believe that the NIW category is only available to scientists with published work and dozens of citations. But that’s no longer the case. The immigration system has evolved, and so have the types of professionals who qualify. We have successfully helped clients in industries like cybersecurity, financial technology, education reform, and engineering obtain green cards without employer sponsorship.

What Is the National Interest Waiver (NIW)?

The NIW falls under the EB-2 immigrant visa category. It allows certain foreign nationals to self-petition for a green card without a job offer or labor certification if they can show that their work has substantial merit and national importance, and that waiving the standard job offer requirement would benefit the United States.

This category is especially valuable for:

  • Freelancers and independent consultants
  • Entrepreneurs and business owners
  • Educators and nonprofit professionals
  • Researchers and applied professionals in non-academic roles

How We Helped Clients Succeed Without Publications or Citations

Here are three real examples of how we guided non-traditional professionals through the NIW process and won approval:

Cybersecurity Consultant

Our client specialized in protecting critical infrastructure systems from cyber threats. Although he had no publications or formal academic accolades, he had a strong track record of implementing security protocols for municipal water systems and financial platforms. We highlighted how his work prevented cyberattacks that could cripple public services and argued that his continued presence in the US was in the national interest. He was approved for a green card without any employer sponsorship.

Financial Technology (FinTech) Data Analyst

This client worked on AI-based fraud detection algorithms for a mobile banking company. While she wasn’t in a “research” role, her contributions significantly reduced digital fraud losses across the financial sector. We built a strong narrative around the economic impact of her work and supported it with evidence from the companies she helped secure. The case was approved in under six months.

STEM Educator Reforming Curriculum in Underserved Communities

A former teacher and curriculum designer had pioneered new teaching models to increase math and science proficiency in low income school districts. We showed how her work addressed critical education gaps in the US, aligned with federal education goals, and demonstrated both merit and national importance. She received her green card without needing a university or school district to sponsor her.

Why These NIW Cases Succeed And Why Most Self-Filers Get Denied

Success in non-traditional NIW cases depends on more than just professional experience. It depends on how well the case is presented, argued, and documented. USCIS officers want a clear, legally persuasive argument supported by real world impact, third party validation, and forward-looking national benefit. That’s where our law firm comes in.

We’ve helped professionals from over 25 countries win NIW approvals even without citations, academic degrees, or large employers behind them. Our approach includes:

  • Building a compelling personal narrative
  • Highlighting US policy alignment (national security, education, innovation, etc.)
  • Strategically presenting letters of support and project evidence
  • Anticipating and preemptively addressing USCIS concerns

Let’s Get Started on Your NIW Green Card

If you’re a skilled professional and think you don’t qualify for a green card, think again. With the right legal strategy, you may be just one application away from permanent residence in the United States.

Contact our office today to schedule a consultation at info@messersmithlaw.com or (305) 515-0613. We’ll evaluate your background, determine your NIW eligibility, and guide you through a tailored, high impact petition.

A Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) for I-485 (Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status)

by

If you’ve received a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) on your I-485 green card application, it means USCIS has flagged serious issues with your case. But it’s not yet a denial. A NOID gives you an opportunity, typically 30 days, to respond with evidence, explanations, or legal arguments to address the concerns. We’ve helped many clients turn NOIDs around by submitting strategic, well supported responses. The key is acting quickly and understanding exactly what USCIS is questioning.

Why Are NOIDs for I-485 Becoming More Common?

Over the last few years, we’ve seen a sharp increase in NOIDs, especially in marriage based and humanitarian cases. USCIS now applies a much higher level of scrutiny to issues like immigration history, prior misstatements, or insufficient supporting documents. In some cases, USCIS issues a NOID due to something as simple as a missing I-693 medical exam, but in other cases, it could be due to inadmissibility grounds, criminal records, or suspected fraud.

Marriage based cases are particularly vulnerable to NOIDs when couples fail to submit strong evidence of a bona fide relationship, give inconsistent answers during the interview, or lack joint documentation. Employment based cases may face NOIDs over concerns about unauthorized work, gaps in visa status, or misrepresentation on past applications. USCIS also now regularly cross references visa history, public records, and internal databases, increasing the chances of a flag, even for honest mistakes.

Common Reasons for I-485 NOIDs

  • Inadmissibility Grounds (INA §212(a))
    Includes unlawful presence, criminal arrests, prior fraud, or health related concerns
  • Marriage-Based Concerns
    USCIS suspects a sham marriage, or finds conflicting testimony or weak documentation
  • Immigration Violations
    Past unauthorized work, unlawful entry, overstays, or status gaps
  • Missing or Incomplete Documents
    Medical exam (Form I-693), police clearance, or inconsistent biographical info
  • Security or Background Check Flags
    Name hits on security watchlists or unresolved background issues

How We Help Respond to a NOID

We approach each NOID by first identifying exactly what triggered it. Then we help our clients gather the necessary legal, personal, and documentary evidence to build a persuasive response. In marriage based cases, we often supplement the file with stronger joint evidence, affidavits, and a legal explanation of the relationship history. For inadmissibility related NOIDs, we submit waivers, legal briefs, or correction demands to challenge errors in the government’s records.

Our responses are custom tailored. USCIS doesn’t accept excuses. They want clear, organized, and well supported answers. We know what officers look for and how to respond to each category of concern effectively. In many cases, our legal intervention has made the difference between denial and approval.

Take Action Before It’s Too Late

If you’ve received a NOID, you are on the edge of a denial but you still have time to save your case. The 30 day deadline comes fast, and a weak or incomplete response can seal the denial. Let us help you prepare the strongest response possible. Call our office now at (305) 515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com to schedule a consultation. We’ll review your NOID, assess your options, and help you fight to keep your green card application alive. We’ve handled hundreds of complex immigration cases and we’re ready to help you next.

How to overcome Section 212(a)(9)(B)

by

​If you’ve been told that you’re inadmissible under INA Section 212(a)(9)(B) due to unlawful presence, you’re likely worried about the possibility of a 3 year or 10 year bar from returning to the United States. These bars apply when someone overstays their authorized period of stay and then departs the US which triggers long term consequences that affect your ability to obtain a visa or green card. But these situations can often be challenged or waived, depending on your circumstances. If you’re in this position, don’t assume you’re out of options. Many of our clients have successfully overcome this problem with the right legal strategy.

Why These Bars Are More Common and Sometimes Wrong

The 3 year bar applies to individuals who were unlawfully present for more than 180 days but less than one year, while the 10 year bar applies to those who were unlawfully present for one year or more. These penalties are triggered once you leave the US, and they can derail visa applications and family-based immigration cases. Unfortunately, we’ve seen many situations where USCIS or CBP made a mistake, showing someone overstayed when, in fact, they left on time or had legal status. In those cases, we’ve helped clients track down records, identify CBP errors, and correct the government’s mistake, allowing them to avoid a bar entirely.

Even when the unlawful presence is accurate, there are still legal remedies available. We frequently assist clients in applying for the I-601A Provisional Unlawful Presence Waiver, which allows them to request forgiveness before leaving the country for a visa interview. These waivers are discretionary and are granted based on a showing that refusal of admission would cause extreme hardship to a qualifying US citizen or permanent resident spouse or parent. It’s important to understand that this waiver only covers unlawful presence, so if there are other issues such as prior fraud, criminal convictions, or removal orders, additional waivers may be required.

How We Help Clients Overcome Unlawful Presence Bars

Whether you’re facing an incorrect inadmissibility finding or need to build a strong waiver case, we know how to help. We’ve worked with clients who were wrongly barred due to database errors and successfully challenged those determinations. For those who did accrue unlawful presence, we’ve guided them through the I-601A process, helping them gather the right documentation to prove hardship and ultimately secure approval. We understand how to spot problems before they cause a denial, and we’re here to help you avoid painful delays or permanent bars.

Talk to an Immigration Lawyer Before You Take the Next Step

If you’re facing a 3 year or 10 year bar under INA 212(a)(9)(B), don’t guess your way through it. Let us help you fix it the right way. Whether you’re inside or outside the US, we’ll help you understand your options, correct any errors in your record, and apply for a waiver if needed. Call our office today at (305) 515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com to schedule a consultation. We’ll review your immigration history, develop a strategy, and fight to get you back on the path to legal status in the United States.

Green Card Interview Lawyer

by

If your green card interview is coming up, or you’ve received a notice from USCIS, you may be feeling nervous or unsure about what to expect. The interview is a critical step in the adjustment of status process, and any mistake, whether in documents, answers, or past immigration history, can result in delays, a Request for Evidence (RFE), or even a denial. The good news is that with the right legal help, many of these issues can be identified and resolved ahead of time, increasing your chances of approval.

Why Green Card Interviews Can Be Risky

In recent years, USCIS has increased its scrutiny of adjustment of status applications, especially those based on marriage or prior visa history. Officers now look closely at every detail including past visa violations, inconsistent information, or prior entries to the US can all trigger concern. For marriage based interviews, couples can be separated and questioned individually, and even small contradictions can raise red flags.

We’ve seen an uptick in cases where interviews result in unexpected RFEs or Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs). Not because the applicant was ineligible, but because they weren’t properly prepared. In more complex cases involving prior immigration issues, criminal records, or multiple visa entries, applicants often benefit from having a lawyer present during the interview to clarify legal issues and ensure fair treatment.

How We Help Before, During, and After the Interview

We work with clients in all stages of the interview process. Before the interview, we review your application, check for red flags, and conduct mock interviews to prepare you and your spouse (if applicable). During the interview, we can attend with you to protect your rights, clarify misunderstandings, and present key evidence. After the interview, we help respond to RFEs, NOIDs, or denials whether through a motion to reopen, appeal, or strategic re-filing.

Let Us Help You Get It Right

Your green card interview can determine the outcome of your entire case. Don’t take the risk of going in unprepared. Call my office today at (305) 515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com to schedule a consultation. We’ll help you understand what to expect and how to prepare for success. With the right strategy and support, you can move forward confidently toward permanent residence.

Deportation at the Border

by

Can You Be Detained and Deported at the Border?

Yes, US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officers at land border crossings have the authority to detain, question, and deport travelers attempting to enter the United States. If CBP officers believe you are inadmissible due to issues such as missing documents, prior immigration violations, or suspected fraud, they can cancel your visa, deny your entry, and even issue an expedited removal order Section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) and Section 212(a)(7)(B), which can bar you from returning to the US for up to five years or more. In some cases, individuals are taken into detention and placed in formal removal proceedings.

However, a border deportation does not always mean your case is over. Many people who are turned away or deported can still challenge the decision or apply for legal waivers to return. Here are three cases where we successfully helped clients after they were deported at the border.

Case 1: Denied Entry for Suspected Unauthorized Work

An Indian IT consultant, traveling on an H1B visa, was stopped at the US-Canada border and accused of planning to work outside the scope of his visa. CBP officers denied his entry, canceled his H1B status, and told him he would need a different visa to return. We reviewed his case and prepared a legal brief clarifying his job duties, showing that his role was fully compliant with H1B regulations. After filing the necessary paperwork with the consulate, he was able to obtain a new H1B visa and return to work in the US.

Case 2: F1 Visa Holder Detained Due to OPT SEVIS Issues Caused by her University

The F1 visa holder’s university made a mistake with her SEVIS.  Instead of fixing it, they advised her to reenter the US through Mexico to resolve this issue.  She was detained at the border and her visa was cancelled.  Her family retained us and we worked with the detention officer for her release.  After she was released, we were able to work with the school and helped her obtain a new visa to return back to the US.

Case 3: Expedited Removal Due to Alleged Visa Fraud

An Asian visitor on a B2 visa was attempting to cross into the US from Mexico when CBP officers accused him of misrepresenting his travel plans. They suspected he intended to stay longer than allowed and issued an expedited removal order, banning him from re-entering for five years. We appealed the decision, proving that he had no intention of violating his visa. After months of advocacy, we won his case, and he was able to travel to the US again legally.

Have You Been Deported at the Border? Contact Us Today

If you have been turned away or deported at a U.S. land border, you may still have options. Waivers, and legal challenges can help reverse a wrongful deportation or allow you to re-enter in the future. Time is critical and acting quickly can improve your chances of success. Contact my office immediately at 305-515-0613 or info@messersmithlaw.com for a consultation. We have extensive experience helping individuals fight border deportations and regain their ability to enter the US.