Understanding the J-1 Visa Waiver and the Two-Year Home Residency Requirement

by

The J-1 visa is a popular choice for exchange visitors coming to the United States for a variety of programs, including research, training, and teaching. However, many J-1 visa holders are subject to a two-year foreign residency requirement, often referred to as the “two-year rule.” This rule mandates that certain J-1 visa holders must return to their home country or country of last habitual residence for at least two years before they are eligible to apply for certain U.S. visas or permanent residency. Understanding whether you are subject to this requirement and how to navigate it is crucial for J-1 visa holders planning their future in the United States.

Determining Whether You Are Subject to the Two-Year Rule

To determine if you are subject to the two-year home residency requirement, start by checking your J visa and Form DS-2019 (formerly Form IAP-66). If the box indicating that you are “subject to the two-year rule” is checked, you are required to fulfill this condition. However, even if the box is not checked, you may still be subject to the rule based on other factors. It is advisable to consult with an experienced immigration attorney who can provide a definitive evaluation of your status.

Changing Status While Subject to the Two-Year Rule

For J-1 visa holders subject to the two-year rule, changing status to another non-immigrant visa or applying for an immigrant visa can be complicated. While you may apply for certain non-immigrant visas at a U.S. consulate abroad, you cannot obtain H or L visas, or adjust to permanent resident status, until you have either fulfilled the two-year residency requirement or obtained a waiver. This restriction can pose significant challenges for those wishing to remain in the U.S. or transition to a different immigration status.

Obtaining a J-1 Waiver

If fulfilling the two-year residency requirement is not feasible or desirable, obtaining a J-1 waiver is an alternative path. A waiver may be granted under certain circumstances, such as if the J-1 visa holder can demonstrate that returning to their home country would cause extreme hardship to a U.S. citizen or permanent resident spouse or child, or if the visa holder’s home country government provides a “no objection” statement to the waiver. Other grounds for a waiver include persecution concerns or the interest of a U.S. government agency. If granted, the waiver allows the J-1 visa holder to bypass the two-year rule and apply for other visas or adjust their status within the U.S.

Important Considerations for J-1 Visa Holders

It is important to note that the two-year rule also applies to J-2 dependents, such as spouses and children of J-1 visa holders. If the principal J-1 holder is subject to the requirement, their J-2 dependents are as well. However, if the J-1 holder obtains a waiver, the J-2 dependents are relieved of the requirement. Furthermore, the two-year residency requirement must be fulfilled in the country where the J-1 visa holder resided at the time they received their J-1 status, regardless of whether they later become a citizen or permanent resident of another country.

Navigating the complexities of the J-1 visa waiver and the two-year home residency requirement can be challenging, but with the right guidance and preparation, it is possible to find a path that aligns with your long-term goals. If you believe you are subject to the two-year rule or need assistance with obtaining a waiver, consulting with an experienced immigration attorney is the best course of action to ensure that your case is handled effectively.

We have successfully helped many people obtain J1 waivers. If you’d like our help, please contact us at 305-515-0613 or info@messersmithlaw.com. We are here to assist you.

Navigating the Asylum Process: What You Need to Know

by

Seeking asylum in the United States is a complex process that offers protection to individuals who have a well-founded fear of persecution in their home country. However, understanding the intricacies of asylum, including the role of USCIS, the importance of legal representation, and the differences between asylum and withholding of removal, is crucial for anyone considering this path.

Understanding USCIS and the Asylum Process

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is the government agency responsible for handling various immigration matters, including asylum applications. When you file for asylum affirmatively, your application is first reviewed by USCIS. If your case is strong, you may be granted asylum after an interview with an asylum officer. However, if USCIS does not approve your application, and you are out of status, your case will be referred to an immigration court, where you can renew your asylum claim as part of removal proceedings. In contrast, if you are already in removal proceedings, your asylum application will be heard directly by the immigration court.

The Importance of Legal Representation

Filing for asylum is not just about submitting forms; it involves presenting a detailed and credible case that convinces the authorities of your fear of persecution. An experienced immigration attorney can help you organize this information and present your case effectively, increasing your chances of success. Moreover, attorneys can navigate the procedural complexities, such as meeting filing deadlines and addressing any requests for additional evidence.

Differences Between Asylum and Withholding of Removal

Asylum and withholding of removal are both forms of protection available to individuals facing persecution, but they differ in significant ways. Asylum grants you legal status in the U.S., allowing you to work, bring your family, and eventually apply for permanent residency. Withholding of removal, on the other hand, simply prevents you from being deported to a country where you would likely face persecution. While withholding of removal offers protection, it does not provide the same benefits as asylum, such as a path to permanent residency. Additionally, the burden of proof is higher for withholding of removal, requiring you to show that it is more likely than not that you would be persecuted if returned to your home country.

Conclusion

The asylum process in the United States is a vital lifeline for those fleeing persecution, but it is also fraught with legal challenges and complexities. Whether you are filing affirmatively with USCIS or defending your claim in immigration court, having a thorough understanding of the process and securing skilled legal representation are key to achieving a successful outcome. If you are considering applying for asylum, it is crucial to act quickly and consult with an experienced immigration attorney to ensure that your application is prepared correctly and that you meet all necessary deadlines.

We have successfully helped many people win complicated asylum cases. If you’d like our help, please contact us at 305-515-0613 or info@messersmithlaw.com. We are here to assist you.

J-2 Waiver: Navigating the Process for Spouses and Children

by

A J-2 spouse or child is subject to the same requirements as their J-1 exchange visitor spouse or parent. Generally, J-2 spouses and children cannot independently apply for waiver recommendations if their J-1 spouses or parents are not applying. However, there are exceptions, and all such cases are evaluated by the Waiver Review Division on a case-by-case basis. The State Department will act on behalf of J-2 applicants only rarely and typically for humanitarian circumstances.

If you, as a J-2 spouse or child, believe that your situation merits special consideration based on one of these exceptions, it’s important to understand that the process is extremely complicated. Despite the challenges, we have successfully helped many clients obtain J-2 waivers independently, even when their J-1 spouses or parents were not applying.

Successful Case 1: In one case, the J-1 and J-2 holders were divorced, and the J-2 holder wanted to stay and work in the U.S. We petitioned the appropriate government agency. The process took about four months. After the waiver was approved, we assisted the client in obtaining an H1B visa.

Successful Case 2: Another client entered the U.S. on a J-2 visa with her parent. She later obtained an F1 visa and met a U.S. citizen, with whom she wanted to marry. Her parent, the J-1 holder, had returned to China and had no plans to return to the U.S. We were able to secure a J-2 waiver for her without any involvement from her parent.

If you have a similar case, please contact us at 305-515-0613 or email us at info@messersmithlaw.com. We can help you expertly prepare and file your waiver request with the State Department.

Immigration Success Stories – INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) and 212(a)(9)(B)

by

Any foreign national who has been unlawfully present in the U.S. for more than 180 days faces a three-year ban on reentry, and those unlawfully present for one year or more face a ten-year ban. However, there are exceptions and nuances in the law that can be leveraged to achieve successful outcomes.

For instance, any alien (other than one lawfully admitted for permanent residence) who has been unlawfully present in the United States for more than 180 days but less than one year, and then voluntarily departs and seeks reentry within three years, is considered inadmissible. Similarly, those unlawfully present for a year or more who seek reentry within ten years are also inadmissible. However, time spent under the age of 18, while a bona fide asylum application is pending, or under family unity protection does not count towards the unlawful presence period. Additionally, VAWA petitioners and victims of severe trafficking can also be exempt from these provisions.

We have successfully assisted many clients in overcoming Notices of Intent to Deny (NOID) due to INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) and INA 212(a)(9)(B). Here are a few notable success stories:

One of our clients, who had an approved I-140 through the EB1 category and was on an O1 visa, received an NOID. During his in-person interview, USCIS questioned him about his O1 visa application and issued an NOID citing INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) for misrepresentation and INA 212(a)(9)(B) for unlawful presence. USCIS argued that his stay on the O1 visa was unlawful due to alleged misrepresentation upon his initial entry to the U.S. We meticulously pieced together all aspects of his case, demonstrating the validity of his claims and ultimately secured a successful outcome.

Another case involved a client sponsored by his U.S. citizen wife. Despite their approved I-130, the client received an NOID citing INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) and INA 212(a)(9)(B) for alleged marriage fraud and overstay which related to his previous B2 visa application. Inconsistencies during the I-485 interview raised red flags, complicating their case. We presented a compelling legal argument and provided sufficient evidence to counter the allegations, leading to the approval of the I-485.

These cases highlight the importance of thorough preparation, strategic legal arguments, and a deep understanding of immigration law. If you are facing similar challenges, we are here to help. Please contact us at 305-515-0613 or info@messersmithlaw.com for expert assistance with your immigration needs.

Understanding the O1 Visa: A Pathway for Extraordinary Talent

by

The O1 visa is a unique non-immigrant status designed for individuals who possess extraordinary abilities in fields such as science, arts, education, business, or athletics. This visa category allows highly qualified individuals to live and work in the United States based on their exceptional talents. Unlike other visa categories, the O1 visa is not only limited to certain professions but also offers a flexible and expansive opportunity for those who have reached the pinnacle of their careers.

Categories and Eligibility for O1 Status

The O1 visa is divided into several categories tailored to different fields of extraordinary ability. The O1A is for individuals with extraordinary abilities in sciences, education, business, or athletics. The O1B, on the other hand, is for those with exceptional abilities in the arts or extraordinary achievements in the motion picture and television industries. Additionally, the O2 visa is available for individuals who accompany an O1 visa holder to assist in specific events or performances, while the O3 visa is designated for the spouse and children of O1 and O2 visa holders. The initial period of stay for an O1 visa is typically up to three years, with extensions available in one-year increments based on the ongoing need for the individual’s services.

Circumstances for Seeking an O1 Visa

The O1 visa is specifically intended for situations where an employer in the U.S. requires an individual’s extraordinary skills for a temporary period. Qualifying events or activities can range widely, including scientific projects, conferences, lectures, business projects, and more. Even if a job does not fit a traditional engagement, it may still qualify as long as it relates to the individual’s extraordinary ability. This flexibility allows the O1 visa to accommodate various types of work, from short-term projects to ongoing engagements.

Benefits of the O1 Visa

One of the key advantages of the O1 visa is its broad scope compared to other employment-related visas, such as the H1B. The O1 visa is not limited by annual quotas and can apply to a wider range of professions, including athletes and entertainers who may not qualify for other visa types. Additionally, the O1 visa is particularly beneficial for individuals who have previously held J1 or J2 status, as it allows them to bypass the two-year foreign residency requirement that typically restricts their ability to obtain other visas like the H or L visa. Furthermore, the O1 visa does not have a maximum length of stay, allowing for continuous renewals as long as the individual’s services are needed.

Get Started on Your O1 Visa Petition Today

If you want to obtain an O1 visa and need our help, please contact us at 305-515-0613 or info@messersmithlaw.com. We are here to assist you.

I-485 NOID Successful Case: Overcoming Challenges of Unauthorized Employment

by

Our client, holding an H1B visa status, faced a significant challenge with a pending I-485 application. He received a Notice of Intent to Deny (NOID) due to unauthorized employment when he applied for OPT. During this period, he was associated with AZ Technology LLC and had submitted a resume indicating his employment with them. USCIS suspected fraud and misrepresentation in this case and also hinted at the potential revocation of his approved I-140.

The client was partially at fault, as he remained with AZ Technology LLC for some time after discovering the company’s fraudulent activities. This added complexity to the case, as he did not immediately leave the employer due to the lack of an alternative job.

Despite these challenges, we developed a strategic legal response to the NOID. Our approach successfully addressed USCIS’s concerns, leading to the approval of the I-485 application.

If you are facing a similar situation and need assistance, please contact us at 305-515-0613 or info@messersmithlaw.com. We’re here to help.

I-612 J1 Hardship Waiver Successful Case: Overcoming the Two-Year Home Country Requirement

by

Our client, a Fulbright scholar from Norway, faced a significant challenge due to the two-year home country requirement under 212(E). While in the U.S., he met and married his wife, who suffers from anxiety and minor depression. She is employed and attending university in the U.S. If he had to return to Norway to fulfill his two-year requirement, it would have caused considerable hardship for his wife in various aspects of her life.

Upon taking the case, we collaborated closely with our clients to meticulously document the hardships and gather supporting evidence. Our comprehensive approach convinced USCIS of the significant hardship, resulting in a favorable recommendation to the State Department. Both the State Department and the Fulbright program concurred with our assessment and approved the waiver.

Contrary to common belief, it is not necessary to have a U.S. citizen child to obtain a hardship waiver. Although the J1 hardship waiver is notoriously difficult to secure, we have successfully obtained approvals for many clients, including Fulbright scholars.

If you need assistance with a similar case, please contact us at 305-515-0613 or info@messersmithlaw.com. We are here to help.

INA 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) Expedited Removal Successful Case: Overcoming a 5-Year Entry Bar

by

Our client, a successful businessman from the UK, faced a significant hurdle when he was refused entry to the U.S. and barred for five years. The Customs and Border Protection (CBP) believed he had failed to properly disclose a misdemeanor from 25 years ago that had been expunged. Despite having traveled to the U.S. numerous times for business and pleasure without any issues, this incident resulted in a directive from the CBP to apply for a different visa after the five-year period to conduct business in the U.S.

Understanding the urgency and importance of frequent travel to the U.S. for his business, he reached out to us for assistance.

We promptly engaged with CBP in an effort to remove the five-year bar. After persistent efforts and coordination with two different CBP offices, we successfully had the bar lifted. Subsequently, we assisted the client in obtaining an L1 visa, which we determined to be more suitable for his business needs.

If you are facing a similar situation and need our help, please contact us at 305-515-0613 or info@messersmithlaw.com. We are here to assist you.

LCA Errors that can Lead to H1B Visa Refusals and INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) Inadmissibility Determinations

by

Errors made by the visa applicant in regards to the Labor Condition Application (LCA) can cause significant problems and potentially jeopardize their chances of obtaining an H-1B visa. It’s crucial to avoid common mistakes that can lead to visa denials and inadmissibility determinations under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i). Here are some frequent errors and their implications:

Misrepresenting the Terms of the Job Offer: Visa applicants must accurately represent the terms of the job offer in the LCA, including job duties, salary, and working conditions. Any misrepresentation can be considered fraud, leading to a visa denial. It’s essential to provide truthful and precise information to avoid accusations of misrepresentation.

Failing to Comply with the Prevailing Wage: The Department of Labor mandates that H-1B visa holders must be paid the prevailing wage for their job. If an applicant is paid less than the prevailing wage, it violates the LCA and can result in a visa denial. Ensuring compliance with wage requirements is critical to maintaining legal status.

Failing to Disclose Previous Immigration Violations: Visa applicants must disclose any previous immigration violations, such as overstays or unauthorized employment. Failing to disclose such violations can be considered fraud and result in a visa denial. Full transparency regarding immigration history is vital to avoid complications.

Failing to Comply with the Terms of the Visa: H-1B visa holders must adhere to the terms of their visa, including maintaining status, working only for the employer listed on the LCA, and not engaging in unauthorized employment. Non-compliance can lead to visa denial or revocation of visa status. Adhering strictly to visa terms helps ensure continued legal status in the U.S.

Failing to Notify the Department of Labor of Changes: Any changes to the job offer terms, such as job duties, salary, or working conditions, must be reported to the Department of Labor. Failure to report these changes can result in LCA violations and visa denial. Keeping the Department of Labor informed of any job-related changes is crucial.

If an H-1B visa applicant is accused of fraud under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i), it’s imperative to take immediate action. Here are steps to potentially resolve the situation and overcome fraud accusations:

  1. Contact Us Immediately: Call us at 305-515-0613 or email us at info@messersmithlaw.com. Our experienced immigration attorney, with over 20 years of experience, can review your case and advise on the best course of action.
  2. Gather Evidence: We will help you gather evidence to refute the fraud allegations, ensuring you have a strong case.
  3. Cooperate with Authorities: We will guide you on how to cooperate fully with authorities, including attending interviews or providing additional documentation as requested.

If you have been accused of fraud or misrepresentation due to a misunderstanding involving your LCA, contact our office through our website or give us a call at 305-515-0613. We look forward to helping you win your case, as we have for thousands of other clients.

Employment green card Interview

by

USCIS may request that you appear at a USCIS office for an interview based on your petition. Interviews are typically mandatory for any type of immigrant violation or criminal issue. Here are a few examples of interviews we have attended with our clients, showcasing the diverse challenges and successful outcomes we’ve achieved.

Client 1 was from China and had previously been a member of the Communist Party but forgot to disclose this information when filing the I-485. At the interview, we were able to rectify the situation, and the case was approved.

Client 2 was on OPT, but the company he was working for defrauded him and did not provide any work as agreed. We clarified the issue during the interview, and USCIS approved the case.

Client 3 was charged with shoplifting, which could potentially result in a finding of a crime involving moral turpitude under INA 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I). We provided additional evidence to avoid this finding, and the green card was approved.

Client 4 was refused B1/B2 entry once under INA 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I), resulting in removal and a five-year bar on reentry. We explained the circumstances to the officer, cleared up several issues, and secured the green card approval.

Client 5 was on an H1B visa, but his work location was different than what was indicated in the I-129 filing, resulting in an RFE. We responded to the RFE, clarifying the situation, and the case was approved.

Client 6 entered the U.S. on an L1 visa, but USCIS suspected a misrepresentation issue under INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i) on his DS-160. USCIS was correct, so we filed a waiver, which was approved along with his green card.

These examples illustrate the types of issues that might lead to a USCIS interview. If you are concerned about your upcoming interview, please contact us by email or by phone at 305-515-0613. We can help you prepare and develop a strategy to win your case.