Section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) & 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(II) Successful Cases

Section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) & 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(II) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) renders an immigrant inadmissible if, at the time of application for admission, they lack a valid, unexpired immigrant visa or other required entry documents.

This provision applies exclusively to intending immigrants. Nonimmigrants are subject to different documentation requirements under INA 212(a)(7)(B).

Under INA 212(k), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) may, at its discretion, waive this ineligibility for an immigrant visa applicant who was unaware of their ineligibility and could not have reasonably detected it. Such waivers are typically granted in cases where the applicant had no prior knowledge of the documentation deficiency and had no means to ascertain it. ​

Successful Cases:

Case 1:

A client attempting to enter the United States to visit her boyfriend was denied entry by Customs and Border Protection (CBP), citing INA 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I). Her B-2 tourist visa was subsequently revoked.  She reapplied for a B2 visa and was refused under INA 214(b). After consulting with us, we successfully assisted her in obtaining a new B-2 visa, enabling her to visit her boyfriend.

Case 2:

A client from the United Kingdom sought entry into the U.S. under the Visa Waiver Program but was denied by CBP, citing INA 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) and INA 212(a)(2)(D)(i), resulting in a five-year entry ban. CBP suspected her of engaging in prostitution without substantial evidence. We intervened by presenting a robust legal argument that clarified the misunderstanding. Consequently, CBP rescinded the charges, and she regained her eligibility to enter the United States.​

Case 3:

An H-1B visa holder was refused entry under INA 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(II) and INA 212(a)(6)(C)(i). The employer had changed the end client without informing him prior to his travel to the U.S., leading CBP to suspect fraud due to the end client change. We provided compelling evidence demonstrating the client’s lack of intent to deceive. This clarification led to a favorable resolution of his case.​

Need Help Removing 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) & 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(II) Charges? Contact Us Today

If you have been refused entry due to 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) or 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(II), you still have options. Whether you qualify for a legal challenge, a waiver, or a new visa we can help you overcome this problem and regain your immigration status. Call my office at (305) 515-0613 or email info@messersmithlaw.com to discuss your case. We can help you understand your options, collect the right documents, and protect your ability to live, study, or work in the US Let us guide you through this and get your status back on track.

Leave a Comment